Luxury Skincare Brand Case Study

Luxury Skincare Brand Case Study
SEO Case Study

Compounding organic growth for a luxury skincare brand

Two years of content-led SEO strategy that grew organic search performance across a luxury skincare brand’s home page, product pages, and category pages, moving it toward visibility on par with heritage names like Crème de la Mer.

Role
Sr. SEO Strategy & Account Lead
Agency
Ignite Visibility
Program
SEO & Content Strategy
Period
Q4 2022 – Q3 2024
Q2 2023
+50.2%YoY
Organic new users to product pages
Q2 2023
+20.2%YoY
Organic search landing-page revenue
Q3 2024 · ~1 year later
+118%YoY
Total organic search clicks (site-wide, Google Search Console)
Q3 2024 · ~1 year later
Parity
With Crème de la Mer in organic search visibility
The Challenge

Most of the brand’s organic traffic was people who already knew it

The brand competes for search visibility against skincare brands with decades of content history and brand equity: La Mer, La Prairie, Dr. Barbara Sturm.

In late 2022, the large majority of the brand’s organic search traffic was branded: people typing the brand name or a product name directly into Google. Non-branded traffic, the shoppers searching “best face oil” or “luxury moisturizer” before they’ve ever heard of the brand, was a small fraction of the mix.

That meant organic search was mostly re-capturing existing demand rather than creating new demand on the pages that actually sell: the home page, the product pages, and the category pages.

Google search results for luxury moisturizer showing the brand's hero moisturizer
Google search results for “luxury moisturizer,” Q4 2024. The brand’s hero moisturizer (4.9★, 852 reviews) appears alongside Bluemercury, La Prairie, and Bergdorf Goodman.
The Program

Optimize the pages that sell, then build the authority to support them

The strategy prioritized the home page, product pages, and category pages directly: content refreshes, on-page optimization, and technical fixes aimed squarely at the pages where organic traffic turns into revenue.

Content and internal linking played a supporting role rather than a standalone one. Longer-form content was built to earn links and topical authority on its own, then connected through internal linking architecture to pass that authority down into the commercial pages it existed to support.

The results below are organized the same way: first the direct performance of the money pages, then the site-wide growth trajectory, then the supporting content layer further down.

Money Pages

Where the growth actually landed

Ignite Visibility’s quarterly reporting breaks organic performance out by site segment. Isolating the home page and product pages shows the direct effect of the optimization work, separate from the blog.

Segment Organic new users (YoY) Organic conv. rate (YoY) Purchases (YoY)
Home Page · Q2 2023 9,430 (+7.7%) 4.49% (−22%) 621 (−16.4%)
Product Pages · Q2 2023 7,671 (+50.2%) 2.62% (+11.2%) 333 (+25.7%)
All non-blog pages · Q1 2024 23.8K (+21.7%) 4.2% CVR 1,427 (+24%)
Figures are pulled directly from Ignite Visibility’s quarterly business reviews (GA4, default channel grouping, U.S. traffic only). “All non-blog pages” reflects the site excluding the Evidence content section, as reported in the Q1 2024 review. The home page’s revenue held flat year over year on essentially flat traffic, implying a higher average order value; product pages grew on both traffic and conversion volume.
Accelerating Organic Impact

Year-over-year organic growth, by quarter

Site-wide YoY growth reported each quarter
+30% +20.2% +32.8% +118% Q4 2022 Q2 2023 Q1 2024 Q3 2024 organic transactions organic revenue organic traffic organic clicks (GSC)
Each bar reflects the primary organic metric reported in that quarter’s business review, not a single consistent metric tracked identically across all four periods, and each is site-wide (home, product, category, and blog pages combined). The Q3 2024 figure reflects a data-source change from Google Analytics to Google Search Console clicks.
Competitive Position

From outside the conversation to parity with Crème de la Mer

Keyword-overlap analysis in Q3 2024 placed the brand’s organic search visibility on par with Crème de la Mer, and ahead of Dr. Barbara Sturm and La Prairie on both commercial and informational search terms.

Parity
Organic visibility vs. Crème de la Mer
Ahead
Of Dr. Barbara Sturm on commercial & informational terms
Ahead
Of La Prairie on commercial & informational terms
Then vs. Now

Two years of compounding organic growth

Q4 2022
YoY organic growth (site-wide)+30%
Product page organic new usersNot yet isolated
Competitive positionNot yet tracked vs. legacy brands
→
Q3 2024
YoY organic growth (site-wide)+118%
Product page organic new users+50.2% YoY (Q2 2023)
Competitive positionParity with Crème de la Mer
The Blog, As A Supporting Layer

Evidence content: built to earn links and feed the money pages

The site’s “Evidence” section, dermatology-informed articles answering the questions shoppers ask before they’re brand-aware, is a separate content layer from the home, product, and category pages above. It grew quickly off a small base, and its role in the strategy was to earn links and topical authority, then pass that equity into the commercial pages through internal linking.

1,400+
Backlinks earned by the evidence content silo (SEMrush, Q3 2024)
71%
Of tracked top-10 results owned by evidence articles, Q3 2024
+204.7%YoY
Organic new users to evidence pages, Q1 2024 (small base: 3.4K users)
Backlinks to the evidence content, discovered by month
0 200 400 600 525 22/11 23/01 23/05 23/06 23/08 23/09 23/10 23/11 23/12 24/01 24/02 24/03 24/04 24/05 24/06 24/07 24/08 24/09
Reproduced from Ignite Visibility’s Q4 2024 QBR (“Backlinks to the Evidence Segment Discovered by Month,” SEMrush data); values are approximate, read from the original chart. The April 2024 spike coincides with a round of new evidence content and outreach; monthly link discovery settled at a higher baseline afterward than before it.

By Q3 2024, of 1,346 top-10, non-branded Google results tracked across the program’s target keyword set, 953 (71%) were owned by the brand’s evidence articles rather than product or category pages. The page-1 keyword count for the site overall grew from 419 in August 2022 to more than 6,600 by September 2024, a jump driven predominantly by this content section rather than the product and category pages themselves.

Google search results for cream vs lotion showing the brand ranking in People Also Ask context
Google search results for “cream vs lotion,” Q3 2024. The brand’s evidence article ranks alongside CeraVe and dermatology publisher content.
Page-1 keywords, site-wide (majority evidence content)
419 758 801 6,600+ Aug ’22 June ’23 Sept ’23 Sept ’24
Y-axis shown on a logarithmic scale so early-stage growth stays visible alongside the later acceleration. Values are point-in-time snapshots from each quarter’s QBR, not a modeled trend. Per the 71% figure above, most of this growth is evidence-content keywords, not product or category page rankings.
Methodology & Notes
Organic traffic growth
Each quarter’s YoY figure uses the metric reported as primary in that quarter’s business review: Google Analytics organic sessions, users, or transactions for 2022–2023 figures, and Google Search Console clicks for the Q3 2024 figure following a data-source change. These are not the same metric measured identically across all four periods, and are labeled individually in the chart above.
Money-page segment data
Home page and product page figures are pulled directly from Ignite Visibility’s site-segment breakdowns (GA4, default channel grouping, U.S. traffic only). “All non-blog pages” reflects the site excluding the Evidence content section, as defined in the Q1 2024 business review.
Revenue figures
Organic search landing-page revenue reflects Google Analytics’ last-non-direct-click attribution for sessions landing from organic search. It is not total revenue influenced by SEO, and is not directly comparable to store-wide revenue.
Keyword rankings
Page-1 and top-100 keyword counts are pulled from a rank-tracking tool against a tracked keyword set that expanded over time as new evidence content targeted new terms. Growth in keyword count reflects both ranking improvements and an expanding tracked set, and is predominantly attributable to the evidence content section rather than product or category pages, per the 71% figure cited above.
Evidence content backlinks
Backlink counts and the discovered-by-month chart are pulled from SEMrush against the evidence content section of the site specifically. This case study covers content-driven link acquisition and the on-site internal linking architecture used to route that authority to the money pages. It excludes Ignite Visibility’s separate digital PR outreach service line (press placements, contributed articles, product-sample campaigns), which ran concurrently on this account but sat outside this strategist’s scope.
Data excluded from this case study
Two reported conversion-rate declines in the Q1 2024 review (-24% and -60%) were flagged internally as likely attribution or tracking-configuration issues rather than genuine performance drops, and are excluded here. A +1,400% YoY spike in free-listing clicks for a single product (Q3 2024) reflects a low base and a narrow, product-specific channel; it is not presented as a representative metric.
Role & attribution
This program was delivered by Ignite Visibility, a digital marketing agency, on behalf of a luxury skincare client. Jonathan Catalan was the Sr. SEO Strategy & Account Lead on the account throughout the period shown. All figures are sourced from that client’s quarterly business review decks prepared by Ignite Visibility. The client’s name has been withheld here; screenshots are shown for illustrative, factual reporting purposes and reflect information already public on Google’s search results.