Real Estate Auction Company Case Study

← Professional
Case Study · Real Estate Auctions

Closing the Hyperlocal Gap for Real Estate Auction Company

Google’s results had gone city-by-city, but Real Estate Auction Company’s SEO landing pages stopped at the state line. We shipped 1,000 city pages against the highest-priority markets and re-pointed the sitemap at Google. Here’s how the first 58 days are pacing against the modeled trajectory toward Low, Mid, and High ranking targets.

Role
SEO Director
Agency
Ignite Visibility
Launched
July 13, 2026
Data through
September 8, 2026
16,080+16.8%
Engaged sessions to city pages, life-to-date · lift to sitewide organic
513+3.4%
Bottom-line conversions (bid submissions, favorites, accounts) · lift to sitewide organic
3.19%
City-page conversion rate · 3.14% at the original 30-day read
58
Days live as of this report · day 1 = first day with recorded data
The Gap

Search went hyperlocal. The site pages didn’t.

Real Estate Auction Company sells foreclosed homes, and buyers already search city by city: “foreclosed homes San Diego,” not “foreclosed homes California.”

Google’s own results reflect that: a generic query like “foreclosed homes” auto-resolves to city-level results with no location typed in the query at all, and every major competitor (Zillow, Trulia, Redfin, Realtor.com) ranks with a dedicated city page. Real Estate Auction Company had buyer intent at the city level and a real listing inventory to match it, but its SEO footprint stopped at the state page. That mismatch was the entire opportunity.

Google search results for the query 'foreclosed homes' auto-localizing to San Diego results from Zillow, Trulia, Redfin, and Realtor.com
SERP for “foreclosed homes”: every ranking result is already hyperlocal.
The Response

1,000 city pages, prioritized by demand.

ServiceLink Auction city landing page for San Diego, CA showing filterable foreclosure listings with auction dates
Home auctions in San Diego, CA, one of 1,000 city pages shipped in the launch set.

We ranked every U.S. city by GA4 demographic demand and built a template that could scale to all of them without engineering re-litigating layout per market.

We partnered with Real Estate Auction Company’s web engineering team to launch the 1,000 highest-priority cities first, each with its own filterable listing view, auction-status data, and city-specific copy. The site’s XML sitemaps were rebuilt to include the new URLs and resubmitted to Google Search Console to accelerate discovery and indexation.

Pacing

Day 58 of the program

Launched Jul 13 · 58 days of live data · through Sep 8, 2026

The forecast isn’t three parallel outcomes. It’s one path. As the 1,000 city pages earn crawl trust and links, their average ranking position climbs, and traffic compounds rather than adding up linearly. Low, Mid, and High are the same forecast model’s near-term, later, and long-term readings of that one climbing curve, each tied to an average position the keyword set is expected to hold by that point.

Monthly session run-rate: actual, then modeled trajectory to each target
0 30k 60k 90k 120k 150k Launch Mo. 4 Mo. 8 Mo. 12 Mo. 16 Mo. 20 Actual Low · ~Mo.7 Mid · ~Mo.12 High · ~Mo.20
Actual, checkpointed at day 30 and day 58
Modeled trajectory as average position climbs
The trajectory is a single compounding curve fit through the day-58 run-rate and the High-target month; Low and Mid are read off wherever that curve crosses their target value, not independently set. Month count starts at launch (Jul 13). Not a guarantee: a model of how this class of ranking gain has historically compounded.
Current run-rate vs. each target on the trajectory
Now Low · Mo. 7 Mid · Mo. 12 High · Mo. 20 8,317 / mo 19,581 / mo · 2.4× today 44,103 / mo · 5.3× today 145,464 / mo · 17.5× today
Current pace is the trailing daily average (277 engaged sessions/day) projected to a 30-day month. Each target combines the home-auction and foreclosure keyword sets at the average ranking position the trajectory assumes by that month.
Pos. 23–54 → 8 → 5 → 3
Median starting position across the two keyword sets, then the average position the Low, Mid, and High targets assume in turn
Mo. 7 / 12 / 20
Modeled month the trajectory reaches the Low, Mid, and High targets, from launch
42.5%
Share of the Low target already reached at day 58, before rankings have had time to compound
Then vs. Now

The lift held as the sample grew.

The original case study reported the first 30 days. Extending the same read through day 58 nearly doubled the volume without diluting the rate: a sign the early read wasn’t a launch spike.

First 30 days
Engaged sessions8,469
Lift to sitewide organic+14%
Bottom-line conversions266
Lift to sitewide organic+3%
Conversion rate3.14%
→
Day 58 (this report)
Engaged sessions16,080
Lift to sitewide organic+16.8%
Bottom-line conversions513
Lift to sitewide organic+3.4%
Conversion rate3.19%
Methodology
Lift
City-page total divided by sitewide organic total net of city pages, for the same date range (Jul 13–Sep 8, 2026). Sessions: 16,080 ÷ (111,649 − 16,080) = 16.8%. Events: 513 ÷ (15,804 − 513) = 3.4%.
Low / Mid / High targets
Search volume per target keyword × the average click-through rate for a given SERP position (source: FirstPageSage CTR-by-position study), summed across the home-auction and foreclosure keyword sets, at the average position each target assumes as rankings mature (position 8, 5, and 3 respectively).
Trajectory
A single compounding (exponential) curve fit through the day-58 actual run-rate and the High-target month, on the premise that ranking gains compound rather than accrue linearly. Low and Mid are the months that same curve crosses their target values: they are outputs of the curve, not independently scheduled.
Day count
Day 1 is July 13, 2026, the first date with recorded GA4 sessions to a city page. This report reflects data through September 8, 2026, 58 days live.
Agency & attribution
This program was delivered while employed at Ignite Visibility, a digital marketing agency, on behalf of a real estate auction client. Jonathan Catalan was the SEO Director responsible for this work. The client’s name has been withheld here; screenshots are shown for illustrative, factual reporting purposes.